Drawing for STABLE AIR

USPTO serial 78324075

STABLE AIR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGH, TEJBIR
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STABLE AIR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas V. Smurzynski

THOMAS V SMURZYNSKI LAHIVE & COCKFIELD LLPONE POST OFFICE SQBOSTON, MA 02109-2127UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025shoes; components of shoes, namely, uppers, insoles and outsoles; apparel, namely, gloves, tops, pants, shortsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 16, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 16, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 16, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 11, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 19, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 19, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 23, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 23, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 10, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 3, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 13, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 9, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 14, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 19, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 4, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance