USPTO serial 78324310
SIN CITY BREWING COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SIN CITY BREWING COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lauri S. Thompson, Esq.
JASON D FIRTH ESQ GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP3773 HOWARD HUGHES PKWY STE 500 NLAS VEGAS, NV 89169UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Wearing apparel, namely, shirts, t-shirts, polo shirts, golf shirts, tank tops, vests, blouses, sweaters, parkas, turtlenecks, pullovers, skirts, shorts, jeans, slacks, pants, robes, nightshirts and night gowns, pajamas, robes, rompers, socks, coveralls, mittens, gloves, undergarments, jerseys, leotards, hosiery, booties, slippers, scarves, belts, neckties, suspenders, headbands, hats, caps, visors, blazers, rain ponchos, jackets, wind resistant jackets, warm-up suits, jogging suits, sweatshirts, sweat pants, beach wear, namely, bathing suits, beach sandals, beach towels, footwear, namely shoes, boots, sandals, sneakers and athletic shoes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 12, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 12, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |