USPTO serial 78324457
CWHEELS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YAO, GRETTA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CWHEELS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Hub cap cover | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 16, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 19, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 19, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 4, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |