Drawing for AZZINTEC

USPTO serial 78324812

AZZINTEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AZZINTEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kimberly J. Seluga

Kimberly J. Seluga Bromberg & Sunstein LLP125 Summer StreetBoston, MA 02110-1618UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals used in industry; chemicals and combinations of chemicals for use in metal plating, in the electronics industry, and in the manufacture of electronic components, printed circuit boards and components of printed circuit boards; chemicals and combinations of chemicals for use in tin plating and in immersion tin processes; immersion tin plating compositions for the manufacture of printed circuit boards and their components; soldering compositions and soldering chemicalsACTIVE—
007Machines and machine tools for use in metal plating, including tin plating, in immersion tin process, in the manufacture of electronic components, and in the manufacture of printed circuit boards and their components; machines for tin plating onto printed circuit boards and their components; machine coupling and transmission components, namely, transmission gears for machinesACTIVE—
040Plating services, namely, tin plating services for others onto printed circuit boards, circuit board components and products in contact with circuit boardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 9, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 9, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 21, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 22, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 22, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 22, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 8, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 8, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 8, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 14, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 19, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 19, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 21, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 10, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 18, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 28, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 12, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 12, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 1, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 25, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 24, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 8, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2004AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 15, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance