Drawing for YO!

USPTO serial 78324870

YO!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with YO!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert M. Bryan

Robert H. Cameron Robinson Bradshaw & Hinson101 N. Tryon StreetSuite 1900Charlotte, NC 28246

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Breath fresheners; non-medicated breath freshening dissolving strips or tapeACTIVE—
029Snack mix consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts, and/or raisinsACTIVE—
030Candy; candy mints; peppermint candy; chocolate; chocolate bars; chocolate candies; bubble gum; chewing gum; gum sweetsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 17, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 16, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 23, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 23, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 15, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 15, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 22, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 22, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 11, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 11, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 13, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 16, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 16, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 8, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 12, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 12, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 20, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 6, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 22, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 22, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 17, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 17, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 6, 2005ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Nov 30, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 15, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 29, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 18, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 15, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 7, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 10, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 9, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 1, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance