Drawing for MIKE'S LIFESTYLE GOURMET

USPTO serial 78324968

MIKE'S LIFESTYLE GOURMET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRYE, KIMBERLY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIKE'S LIFESTYLE GOURMET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven E. Brunette

STEVEN E BRUNETTE LAW OFFICES OF STEVEN E. BRUNETTE & ASSO4422 PROSPECT AVE STE BYORBA LINDA, CA 92886UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Frozen dinners and meal entrees for breakfast, lunch and dinner, consisting primarily of proteins and/or vegetables with a sauceACTIVE—
030Frozen desserts, namely cakes, ice cream, pies, pastries, cookies and frozen confections, namely filled ice cream cones, and ice cream sandwiches; frozen dinners and entrees, namely pizza, lasagna, pasta and/or riceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 9, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 9, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 10, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 29, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 29, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 1, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 1, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 1, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 7, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 14, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 25, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 8, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 8, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 20, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance