USPTO serial 78325657
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
La Crosse, WI
La Crosse, WI
La Crosse, WI
LA CROSSE, WI
LA CROSSE, WI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shelley J. Safer
SHELLEY J SAFER LATHROP & CLARK LLPSTE 400740 REGENT ST PO BOX 1507MADISON, WI 53701-1507| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | electronic commerce services provided to electric cooperatives, namely, on-line retail and wholesale store services featuring power quality and power reliability products; product demonstration of alternative power generation technologies; and economic analysis provided to cooperatives and utilities in the field of energy rates, rebate programs and incentive programs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 31, 2001 |
| 042 | Energy consulting services in the fields of power quality analysis, energy auditing, energy load management, power reliability, energy efficiency, energy conservation, energy consumption management and standby generation; technical assistance in the field of distributed generation; troubleshooting for the operation of alternative power generation technologies; evaluation of alternative power generation technologies; providing engineering and design consulting services in the field of energy efficiency; consultation and evaluation services provided to cooperatives and utilities in the field of energy rates, rebate programs and incentive programs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 5, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 14, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 22, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |