CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MUTANT CHRONICLES

USPTO serial 78325721

MUTANT CHRONICLES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MUTANT CHRONICLES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Larry Zerner

Larry Zerner Law Office of Larry Zerner1801 Century Park East, Ste. 2400Los Angeles, CA 90067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game software; video game software; computer game programs; video game programsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 18, 2007UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Nov 27, 2007UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
Nov 15, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 24, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 30, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 30, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 30, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 13, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 4, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 4, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 4, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 2, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 2, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 2, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 2, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 2, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 10, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 19, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 19, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 2, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 10, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 21, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 7, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 7, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 28, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2003AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 2003PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance