USPTO serial 78325824
AUTHENTIC DIAMOND COLLECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AUTHENTIC DIAMOND COLLECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRIAN P KINDER
Gary M Anderson FULWIDER PATTON LLP6060 Center Drive, 10th FloorLos Angeles, CA 90045UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | BATTTNG HELMETS, REPLACEMENT WIRE GUARDS AND STRAPS FOR BATTING HELMETS | ABANDONED | — |
| 018 | TRAVEL BAGS OF LEATHER AND IMITATIONS OF LEATHER, TOTE BAGS | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | ATHLETIC APPAREL AND CLOTHING, NAMELY, UNDERSHIRTS, UNDERSHORTS, SHIRTS, VESTS, COMPRESSION VESTS, COMPRESSION SHIRTS, SLIDING SHORTS, COMPRESSION SHORTS AND CAPS | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | SPORTING GOODS, NAMELY, BASEBALLS, SOFTBALLS, PITCHING MACHINE BALLS, CATCHER'S MASKS, WRIST PROTECTIVE GUARDS FOR ATHLETIC USE, HAND PROTECTIVE GUARDS FOR ATHLETIC USE, THROAT PROTECTIVE GUARDS FOR ATHLETIC USE, BATTING GLOVES, MITTS, FACE MASKS, REPLACEMENT FACE MASK PADS, BODY AND CHEST PROTECTIVE GUARDS FOR ATHLETIC USE, UMPIRE BODY AND CHEST PROTECTIVE GUARDS FOR ATHLETIC USE, LEG AND SHIN PROTECTIVE GUARDS FOR ATHLETIC USE, UMPIRE BALL-STRIKE INDICATORS, BASEBALL PLATE BRUSHES, BAGS USED SPECIFICALLY BY UMPIRES FOR CARRYING SPORTS BALLS, ATHLETIC EQUIPMENT BAGS AND TOTE BAGS SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED FOR CARRYING SPORTS EQUIPMENT, BUCKETS DESIGNED FOR CARRYING SPORTS BALLS, FOOTBALL SHOULDER PADS, FOOTBALL SHOULDER AND ARM BRACES, FOOTBALL THIGH GUARDS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Diamond Baseball Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Diamond Baseball Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named AUTHENTIC DIAMOND COLLECTION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 25, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 2, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 16, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |