USPTO serial 78325842
SMARTVISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- TRADEMARK ASSISTANCE CENTER
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMARTVISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Beth Ciocco
MARY BETH CIOCCO MARY BETH CIOCCO LLC22255 CTR RDG RD STE 106ROCKY RIVER, OH 44116-3950UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Home theatre systems, namely, television monitors, Hi-Definition televisions (HD TV), auto television antennas, audio/video receivers, digital video recorders, programmable digital television recorders, DVD players, plasma display panels (PDP), digital light processor (DLP) projectors, projection television and thin film transistor (TFT) and liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SmartVision Technologies Limited
- Other trademarks owned by SmartVision Technologies Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Song, Lin
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SMARTVISION
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 20, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 12, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 9, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 31, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 9, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 17, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 11, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |