USPTO serial 78326295
LATINA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TIERNEY, MARGERY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LATINA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter B. Sorell
PETER B SORELL BOX IPBROWN RUDNICK BERLACK ISRAELS LLPONE FINANCIAL CTRBOSTON, MA 02111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Home textiles, namely, materials for upholstery, draperies, wall coverings, linens, curtains, pillows, bedsheets and quilts; bedding, namely, bed linen, bed spreads, mattress covers, mattress pads, pillows, pillow cases, pillow shams, pillow covers, duvets, duvet covers, comforters, blankets, quilts and quilt covers, bed skirts, dust ruffles, throws, bed scarves, bed sheers; bath linens and table linens; and window treatments, namely, upholstery, drapery, window curtains, window scarves, fabric curtain tiebacks, textile window covering panels and fabric valances | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 9, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 2, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 12, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |