Drawing for BARGAIN COM

USPTO serial 78326415

BARGAIN COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNYDER, NELSON B
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BARGAIN COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter F. Weinberg

PETER F WEINBERG GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP1801 CALIFORNIA ST STE 4100DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Computerized on-line retail store services in the field of automobiles; Providing information in the field of auctions; providing information about automobiles for sale by means of the InternetACTIVE—
036Computerized on-line real estate listing; Providing information in the field of real estate home purchasingINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 23, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 23, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 15, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 15, 2005GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Aug 4, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 1, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 1, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 1, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 1, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 30, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 18, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance