USPTO serial 78326804
V VENUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with V VENUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael Schwarz
EDWARD E VASSALLO FITZPATRICK CELLA HARPER & SCINTO30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumes, essential oils for personal use; cosmetics; cosmetics namely mascara, foundation makeup, lipsticks, eyeliners, face packs, eye shadows, body creams, body milks and body lotions; face creams, face milks and face lotions; hair lotions and dentifrices | ACTIVE | Apr 30, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 30, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2006 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 13, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 3, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 20, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |