USPTO serial 78327106
MONTEZEMOLO & PARTNERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 23, 2005
- Examiner
- BALDWIN, SCOTT
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MONTEZEMOLO & PARTNERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stacey R. Halpern
STACEY R HALPERN KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Montezemolo and Partners S.r.l.
- Other trademarks owned by Montezemolo and Partners S.r.l.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named MONTEZEMOLO & PARTNERS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |