USPTO serial 78327125
NATIONAL ENRICHMENT TEACHERS ASSOCIATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 23, 2005
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NATIONAL ENRICHMENT TEACHERS ASSOCIATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Marina del Rey, CA
Marina del Rey, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edwin Komen
Edwin Komen Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP1300 I Street, NW11th Floor EastWashington, DC 20005-3314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Books, textbooks, workbooks, teaching and training guidebooks and manuals, printed tests, printed reports, newsletters, magazines, pamphlets, portfolios, flyers, leaflets, and brochures, all featuring the promotion, development, certification, licensure, continuing education and maintenance of enrichment teaching methods, programs and curriculum for children | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 4, 2004 |
| 035 | Promoting public awareness regarding the welfare of children in the after-school environment; promoting public awareness and especially awareness between public/private school systems, educators, administrators, and the general public of the need for such united efforts as will secure for every child the highest advantages in physical, mental, social and spiritual education in the after-school environment, including the coordination of efforts and lobbying for the establishment of nationwide industry standards and procedures such as mandatory criteria and requirements for assessment, testing, analysis, evaluation, background checks, certification, licensure, continuing education, recertification and relicensure of enrichment teachers, administrators, association members and others; association services, namely, promoting and developing the interests of enrichment teachers, administrators and association members through the admission of members to the association and the establishment of standards and procedures for the assessment, testing, analysis, evaluation, background checks, certification, licensure, continuing education, recertification and relicensure of enrichment teachers, administrators, association members and others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2003 |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing and conducting classes, seminars, conferences and workshops to educate, train and instruct individuals, teachers and administrators in the field of enrichment teaching programs for children, including after school enrichment programs; providing information related to enrichment teaching methods, programs and curriculum | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Appleman, Cheryl I.
- Other trademarks owned by Appleman, Cheryl I.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named NATIONAL ENRICHMENT TEACHERS ASSOCIATION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 27, 2011 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 26, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 13, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |