Drawing for CRUNK AND DISORDERLY CHRISTMAS

USPTO serial 78327325

CRUNK AND DISORDERLY CHRISTMAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRUNK AND DISORDERLY CHRISTMAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jacqueline M. Sussman

JACQUELINE M SUSSMAN TVT RECORDS23 E 4TH STNEW YORK, NY 10003-7023UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Musical sound recordings featuring pre-recorded music on compact discs, tape cassettes and vinyl records; musical audio-video recordings that are prerecorded on CD-ROMs, VHS videotapes, DVD and laser discsACTIVE—
035Preparing and placing advertisements for others regarding live and recorded musical performances via electronic, print and audio/vidual media; retail and wholesale distributorship and ordering services featuring musical sound recordings and videotapesACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, production of musical sound recordings, live performances by musicians, production of live musical performances, production of music concerts and production of television and cable television programsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 26, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 3, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 13, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 11, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 28, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 21, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 30, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 28, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 28, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 28, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 9, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 16, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance