USPTO serial 78327444
ADVANCING FAIL-SAFE CARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINGLE, JAMES W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ADVANCING FAIL-SAFE CARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
South Burlington, VT
South Burlington, VT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence H. Meier, Esq.
LAWRENCE H MEIER ESQ DOWNS RACHLIN MARTIN PLLC199 MAIN STBURLINGTON, VT 05401UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer programs for automating the administrative, financial, billing, and clinical records of healthcare organizations and instructional manuals therefor sold together as a unit, in the medical and healthcare field | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Value added reseller services, namely, distributorship services in the field of computer hardware | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | financial analysis consulting in the medical and healthcare field; and healthcare insurance claims processing consulting in the medical and healthcare field | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | educational training services in the field of computers relating to computer programs in the medical or healthcare field | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer services, namely computer consultation services, software programming services for others, and software design services, all in the medical or healthcare field; computer medical and healthcare software installation services; computer medical and healthcare software repair services; application service provider (ASP) featuring software for automated administrative, financial, billing and clinical records in the field of healthcare; application service provider (ASP) featuring software for allowing healthcare patients, providers and organizations, and business partners of healthcare providers and organizations, to access via local, wide-area and global communications networks databases containing healthcare information and data; application service provider (ASP) featuring software for allowing users to connect together remote computers and computer networks via local, wide-area and global communications networks to allow the exchange of information and data in the field of healthcare; consulting services in the medical and healthcare field, namely, computer systems design consultation of the offices of healthcare providers; consulting services in the medical and healthcare field, namely, computer project management consultation services for the offices of healthcare providers | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | consulting services in the field of improving clinical and hospital healthcare practices in the nature of avoidance of medical errors, medical informatics, setting standards of patient care and implementing and auditing same | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IDX Investment Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by IDX Investment Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named ADVANCING FAIL-SAFE CARE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 14, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 22, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 2, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |