Drawing for THE SPIN-CREDIBLE SPIN DAZZLER

USPTO serial 78327965

THE SPIN-CREDIBLE SPIN DAZZLER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRYAN JOHNSON, HELLEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE SPIN-CREDIBLE SPIN DAZZLER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAY A. BONDELL

JAY A BONDELL SCHWEITZER CORNMAN GROSS & BONDELL LLP292 MADISON AVE FL 19NEW YORK, NY 10017-6313UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007MOTORIZED SPRAY GUNS FOR APPLYING PAINT AND OTHER FLOWABLE MATERIALS, SUCH AS FOOD COLORING, AND KITS COMPRISED OF A SPRAY GUN FOR APPLYING PAINT AND OTHER FLOWABLE MATERIALS, SUCH AS FOOD COLORING, A TURNTABLE, AND FLOWABLE MATERIALS FOR THE SPRAY GUN, SOLD TOGETHER AS A UNITACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 26, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 30, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 19, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 25, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 5, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 23, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 16, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 2, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 27, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 5, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 25, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 9, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance