USPTO serial 78328292
PERFICIO SUPPORTING DELIVERY OF EXCEPTIONAL COMMUNITY LEARNING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 21, 2006
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PERFICIO SUPPORTING DELIVERY OF EXCEPTIONAL COMMUNITY LEARNING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Minneapolis, MN
Minneapolis, MN
Minneapolis, MN
Minneapolis, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth D. Lewen
ELIZABETH D. LEWEN SHERRILL LAW OFFICES, PLLCSUITE 2124756 BANNING AVENUEWHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR DATABASE MANAGEMENT, NAMELY, PLANNING, EXECUTING, MANAGING, MARKETING, AND EVALUATING COMMUNITY EVENTS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ON-LINE EVENT REGISTRATION; SOFTWARE FOR MANAGING FACILITIES, NAMELY, DATABASE MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE FOR MONITORING FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL DATA, TRACKING INVENTORY, AND MANAGING STAFF IN THE FIELDS OF COMMUNITY EDUCATION AND EVENT PLANNING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2004 |
| 042 | [PROVIDING COMPUTER CONSULTATION SERVICES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, PROGRAMMING, AND DEPLOYMENT; PERFORMING INTEGRATION OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS; COMPUTER SYSTEM INSTALLATION, IMPLEMENTATION, ASSESSMENT, MAINTENANCE AND ANALYSIS; TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE PROBLEMS] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sartell Group, Inc., The
- Other trademarks owned by Sartell Group, Inc., The
- Other trademarks owned by Minnix Software, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Minnix Software, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PERFICIO SUPPORTING DELIVERY OF EXCEPTIONAL COMMUNITY LEARNING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 21, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 22, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 13, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 10, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |