USPTO serial 78328384
SECRELUX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 20, 2005
- Examiner
- JOYNER, CHARLES G
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SECRELUX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Sanochemia Diagnostics Deutschland GmbH
Neuss, DE
Other trademarks owned by Sanochemia Diagnostics Deutschland GmbH
Sanochemia Diagnostics Deutschland GmbH
Neuss, DE
Other trademarks owned by Sanochemia Diagnostics Deutschland GmbH
Sanochemia Diagnostics Deutschland GmbH
Neuss, DE
Other trademarks owned by Sanochemia Diagnostics Deutschland GmbH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bart A. Lazar
BART A LAZAR SEYFARTH SHAW LLP131 S DEARBORN ST STE 2400CHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Diagnostic products, namely, radiological and endoscopy diagnostics in the nature of contrast media for use in medical imaging and test reagents for medical diagnosis | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sanochemia Diagnostics Deutschland GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Sanochemia Diagnostics Deutschland GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Sanochemia Diagnostics Deutschland GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named SECRELUX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |