Drawing for KIDNEY LEARNING SYSTEM NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION

USPTO serial 78328820

KIDNEY LEARNING SYSTEM NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HINES, REGINA C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with KIDNEY LEARNING SYSTEM NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian E. Banner

Brian E. Banner H & A Intellectual Property Law, PLLC2847 Duke StreetAlexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009pre-recorded video and audio tapes and multi-media software recorded on CD-ROMs featuring educational programs about all stages of chronic kidney disease along the continuum of care from early detection through treatment and prevention of chronic kidney disease and transplantation, and related conditions including but not limited to diabetes, high blood pressure and cardiovascular diseaseACTIVENov 13, 2003
016printed materials, namely, periodicals and booklets, handbooks, speakers' guides, wall charts, pocket cards, physician toolkits, photographic slide transparencies featuring chronic kidney disease information for the patient and the professional for use in continuing medical education programs to aid in the identification, treatment and prevention of kidney disease and related conditions including but not limited to diabetes, high blood pressure and cardiovascular disease, and information on clinical applications that improve patient treatment outcomesACTIVENov 13, 2003
035physician referral network in the field of chronic kidney disease identification, treatment and preventionACTIVENov 13, 2003
041educational services, namely, providing patient and professional educational programs by conducting seminars, workshops, symposia, discussion groups in the field of chronic kidney disease identification, treatment and prevention, related conditions including but not limited to diabetes, high blood pressure and cardiovascular disease and clinical applications that are used to improve patient treatment outcomes; providing on-line educational programs offering information via the internet in the field of chronic kidney disease identification, treatment and prevention, and related conditions including but not limited to diabetes, high blood pressure and cardiovascular disease, and clinical applications; providing continuing medical education instruction through group meetingsACTIVENov 13, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 17, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 17, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 8, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 14, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 11, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 17, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2004CPEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Dec 14, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 14, 2004CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jun 14, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 10, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance