USPTO serial 78329019
GRAND BAHAMA EXPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 22, 2005
- Examiner
- ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GRAND BAHAMA EXPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Christopher
John Christopher CHRISTOPHER AND WEISBERG, P.A.SUITE 2040200 EAST LAS OLAS BOULEVARDFORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | transportation and delivery of packages, freight and cargo by sea | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Discovery Management, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Discovery Management, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Discovery Management, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named GRAND BAHAMA EXPRESS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 3, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 24, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 21, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 1, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |