USPTO serial 78329237
DUKE OF HOLLYWOOD ORIGINALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3026575Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 13, 2005
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DUKE OF HOLLYWOOD ORIGINALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Apparel for men, women and children namely jeans, pants, slacks, jumpsuits, shorts, skirts, ties, sweaters, knit tops, woven shirts and shells, socks, shoes, sneakers, blouses, t-shirts, dresses, neckerchiefs, cardigans, tunics, hats, gloves, sweaters, belts, overalls, blazers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 10, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by World-One International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by World-One International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by World-One International, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named DUKE OF HOLLYWOOD ORIGINALS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |