USPTO serial 78329464
METRO TRAVEL ACCESSORIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with METRO TRAVEL ACCESSORIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHELE O. SAADEH
MICHELE O SAADEH LAW OFFICES OF JEROME JANGER138 S LASKY DRBEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | COSMETIC BAGS; COSMETIC BAGS SOLD EMPTY; COSMETIC BAGS THAT TOILETRIES CAN BE PLACED INSIDE; TOILETRY BAGS; MEN'S TRAVELLING BAGS THAT TOILETRIES CAN BE PLACED INSIDE; VANITY CASES; HAND BAGS | ACTIVE | Nov 14, 2003 |
| 021 | FITTED COSMETIC BAGS; FITTED COSMETIC BAGS FOR TOILETRIES; FITTED TOILETRY BAGS; FITTED VANITY CASES; CONTAINERS; CONTAINERS FOR USE WITH VANITY CASES AND COSMETIC BAGS; COSMETIC UTENSILS; EYEBROW BRUSHES COMBS; COMB CASES; BRUSHES; BRUSHES FOR FOOTWEAR; NAIL BRUSHES; PERFUME SPRAYERS AND PERFUME VAPORIZERS; POWDER PUFFS; POWDER COMPACTS; SHAVING BRUSHES; SHAVING BRUSHES STANDS; SHOE BRUSHES; SHOE HORNS; SHOE TREES; SOAP BOXES; SOAP DISPENSERS; SOAP HOLDERS; SPONGE HOLDERS; SPONGES; TOILET CASES | ACTIVE | Nov 14, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |