USPTO serial 78329829
MEETING NEEDS, EXCEEDING EXPECTATIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEETING NEEDS, EXCEEDING EXPECTATIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul F. Kilmer
PAUL F KILMER HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLPSTE 1002099 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business acquisition services for others of telecommunication, transmission, and broadcasting facilities | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Real estate acquisition services for others of telecommunication, transmission, and broadcasting facilities; management and brokerage for real estate used in relation to telecommunications, broadcasting and wireless data transfer facilities; leasing of real estate for wireless transmission | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Real estate development services in relation to telecommunications, broadcasting and wireless data transfer facilities; construction of telecommunication, broadcast and wireless data transfer structures; planning and consulting services in the field of installing and maintaining telecommunication, transmission, and broadcasting equipment, apparatus, and instruments; and installation and maintenance of telecommunication, transmission and broadcasting equipment, apparatus, and instruments | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | transmission of data, sound and images by satellite and microwave broadcasting; radio and television broadcasting; telecommunications, namely, local and long-distance transmission of voice, data and graphics by means of telephone, pagers, telegraph, cable, microwave and satellite; telecommunication services for others enabled through the use of mast site sharing, namely, providing cellular telephone services, personal communication services, wireless broadband communication services, paging services and wireless electronic transmission of voice signals, data, facsimile, images and informations; transmission mast site sharing services for the purpose of providing telecommunications services for others, namely, rental of telecommunications base station antennas, equipment, and lines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pinnacle Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Pinnacle Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named MEETING NEEDS, EXCEEDING EXPECTATIONS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 16, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |