USPTO serial 78329834
LOCATION SPECIFIC DIGITAL FINGERPRINT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 27, 2005
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LOCATION SPECIFIC DIGITAL FINGERPRINT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOE A BROCK II
JOE A BROCK PATENT VENTURE GROUP10788 CIVIC CTR DR STE 215RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | Providing user authentication services in e-commerce transactions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 11, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Digital Authentication Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Digital Authentication Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named LOCATION SPECIFIC DIGITAL FINGERPRINT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | โ |
| Dec 27, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | โ |
| Nov 3, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | โ |
| Nov 2, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | โ |
| Oct 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| Oct 28, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | โ |
| Oct 27, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | โ |
| Oct 27, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | โ |
| Oct 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Oct 21, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | โ |
| Apr 21, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | โ |
| Jan 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Jan 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | โ | |
| Jul 14, 2004 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | โ |
| Jul 14, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | โ |
| Jul 1, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Dec 11, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | โ |