USPTO serial 78330376
DINOMORPH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAN, DAWN L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DINOMORPH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Eugene, OR
Eugene, OR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard J. Polley
Richard J. Polley Klarquist Sparkman, LLP121 SW Salmon Street, Suite 1600One World Trade CenterPortland, OR 97204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | software for creating, depicting, and interacting with three-dimensional scientifically-accurate representations of dinosaurs; video game software for creating, depicting, and interacting with three-dimensional scientifically-accurate representations of dinosaurs computer game programs for creating, depicting, and interacting with three-dimensional scientifically-accurate representations of dinosaurs; and video recordings depicting three-dimensional scientifically-accurate representations of dinosaurs | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, production of multimedia presentations scientifically-accurately depicting dinosaurs and providing a web site featuring scientifically-accurate depictions of dinosaurs; entertainment in the nature of prerecorded multimedia presentations depicting scientifically-accurate dinosaurs all on-line via a global computer network; educational services, namely, providing on-line exhibitions and displays and interactive exhibits in the field of scientifically-accurate depiction of dinosaurs rendered through multimedia presentations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by State of Oregon acting by and through the State Board of Higher Education on behalf of the University of Oregon
- Other trademarks owned by State of Oregon acting by and through the State Board of Higher Education on behalf of the University of Oregon
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named DINOMORPH
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 15, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 9, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 16, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 30, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 19, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 16, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 7, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 30, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 30, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |