Drawing for AEROSPACE HIGH PERFORMANCE CENTER

USPTO serial 78330671

AEROSPACE HIGH PERFORMANCE CENTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOULTON, KELLY F
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AEROSPACE HIGH PERFORMANCE CENTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Shirts, T-shirts, pants, sweatpants, shirts, skirts, hatsACTIVE—
041Health and fitness group classes, personal training services namely strength training and conditioning trainingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 2008PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Apr 28, 2008PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 28, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 11, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 11, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 11, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 30, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 30, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 12, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 12, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 22, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
May 10, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 9, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 19, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 23, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 15, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 18, 2005DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Oct 5, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 5, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 5, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 9, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 11, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2005PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 12, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance