USPTO serial 78330774
AMERICA IN THE ROUGH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AMERICA IN THE ROUGH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda J. Taylor
Linda J. Taylor Linda J. Taylor Trade-mark Agent200 North Service Rd. W.Unit 1 Suite 183Oakville, Ontario, L6M 2Y1Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded video tapes, compact discs, DVD's featuring information regarding outdoor hunting and wildlife | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | On-line retailing services featuring outdoor hunting products and apparel | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment in the nature of on-going television program in the field of recreational outdoor hunting and wildlife; providing on-line information via Internet featuring recreational outdoor hunting and wildlife | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dancing Buffalo Productions Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named AMERICA IN THE ROUGH
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 9, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 29, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |