Drawing for NEUROMUSCULAR INSTITUTE

USPTO serial 78331206

NEUROMUSCULAR INSTITUTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAPPENFIELD, ANN
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEUROMUSCULAR INSTITUTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy Asher Legare

HEATHER E BALMAT CHOATE HALL & STEWART LLPTWO INTERNATIONAL PLATTN TRADEMARK ADMINISTRATORBOSTON, MA 02110

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational Services, namely, providing teaching seminars and educational clinics in the fields of general dentistry, cosmetic dentistry, orthodontics and dental laboratory sciencesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 23, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 23, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 7, 2006EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 14, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2005GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 2, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2005AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 27, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 27, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 27, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 17, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 30, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 27, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 18, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance