USPTO serial 78331602
WIPERMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3308111Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 9, 2007
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WIPERMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chagrin Falls, OH
Chagrin Falls, OH
Chagrin Falls, OH
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Vehicle parts, namely, windshield wipers, wiper blades, wiper frames, wiper blade refills, wiper springs, and wiper washers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 26, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 11, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 7, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 10, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 25, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |