USPTO serial 78332124
TIUSA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2990478Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 30, 2005
- Examiner
- CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TIUSA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer L. Kovalcik
JENNIFER L KOVALCIK STITES & HARBISON, PLLC400 W MARKET ST STE 1800LOUISVILLE, KY 40202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Installation, maintenance and repair of network computers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 11, 2005 |
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, electronic transmission of data, images, and documents via computer terminals and audiovisual equipment; providing multiple user access to interactive computer networks; electronic mail services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 11, 2005 |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer games | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 11, 2005 |
| 042 | Electronic commerce payment services, namely providing security and anonymity for electronically transmitted credit card transactions for users to purchase goods and services on the Internet; computer services, namely designing and implementing web sites for others; hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; and technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 11, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PDNS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by PDNS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by PDNS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TIUSA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 16, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 20, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 24, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |