Drawing for ZAXARD

USPTO serial 78332219

ZAXARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JACKSON, STEVEN W
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZAXARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David Ehrlich

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment and prevention of Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, mild cognitive impairment, attention deficit hyperactive disorder, autism, glaucoma, and associated disorder of depression, parkinsonism and neurosisACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 12, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Oct 12, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 11, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 23, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 27, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 27, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 11, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 24, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance