Drawing for HOPECHEST VOICES

USPTO serial 78332758

HOPECHEST VOICES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LORENZO, GEORGE M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOPECHEST VOICES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert J. Frohwein

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic audio playback unit and associated software sold as a unit for receiving, storing, and playing voice-based greetings, anecdotes and history which are captured via web and telephonic channelsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 28, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 19, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 19, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 19, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 19, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 19, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 19, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 22, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 28, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 8, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 21, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 13, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 13, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 8, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 3, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 30, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 27, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 13, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 1, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 1, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 15, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 23, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance