USPTO serial 78333184
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tanda L. Neundorf, Esq.
TANDA L NEUNDORF ESQ FENWICK & W LLP801 CALIFORNIA STSILICON VALLEY CTRMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041-2008| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers; computer hardware; computer peripherals; handheld computers; personal digital assistants; electronic organizers; electronic notepads; telephones; computer gaming machines; connecting and power cables; modems; cellular modems; printers; videophones; disk drives; cameras; add-ons to handheld computers; handheld internet appliances for wireless electronic data transmission and synchronization; audio players; video players; audio receivers; video recorders; compact disk players and changers; battery packs; wireless radios; wireless telephones; computer software for wireless electronic data transmission and synchronization; instant messaging software; pre-recorded computer programs for personal information management; database management software; character recognition software; telephony management software; electronic mail and messaging software; paging software; database synchronization software; computer programs for accessing, browsing and searching online databases; enterprise software; instruction manuals distributed with the foregoing. | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Information data processing services related to wireless electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals and handheld devices, and electronic transmission of messages and data. | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication and on-line communication services, namely, wireless electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals and handheld devices, and electronic transmission of messages and data; electronic transmission of synchronized data and documents; communications via a global computer network or the Internet; electronic mail services; electronic transmission of messages; paging services; voice mail services; providing on-line chat rooms and electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users concerning computers, computer hardware and software, handheld computers, personal digital assistants, electronic organizers, wireless internet appliances, wireless messaging, and wireless electronic data transmission and synchronization; providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer consulting services; computer programming; integration of computer systems and networks; creating and maintaining web-sites; computer hardware and software consulting services; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for electronic messaging, paging, electronic data transmission and synchronization between computer networks and handheld computers; providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network. | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 31, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 10, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 20, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 23, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 23, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 11, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |