Drawing for GAMBLS GAME BASED LEARNING OBJECTS

USPTO serial 78333394

GAMBLS GAME BASED LEARNING OBJECTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MURRAY, DAVID T
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GAMBLS GAME BASED LEARNING OBJECTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KANAN VORA

KANAN VORA TATA INDUSTRIES LIMITED DBA TATA INTERACLEELA BUSINESS PARK 3RD & 4TH FLANDHERI KURLA RD MAROLANDHERI EAST MUMBAI, 400059

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Photographic, cinematographic, signalling, checking (supervision) and teaching apparatus and instruments; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound and images; computer software and floppies, magnetic data carriers, recording discs; data processing equipment and computersACTIVE—
016Paper, card board and goods made from these material, printed matter; book binding material, photographs, stationery; adhesives for stationery; artists materials; paint brushes and office requisites; instructional and teaching material, plastic material for packaging, playing cards, printers' type; printing blocksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 24, 2006PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Feb 8, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 8, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 17, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 21, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 23, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 23, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance