USPTO serial 78333636
ACCEPT NO SUBSTITUTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACCEPT NO SUBSTITUTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin S. Costanza
Kevin S. Costanza Seed IP Law Group PLLCSuite 5400701 Fifth AvenueSeattle, WA 98104Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | safety and emergency equipment, namely, drench showers, decontamination showers, decontaminating eyewash and eye/face wash units, and parts and accessories for use therewith; safety and emergency equipment, namely, standard and custom designed tempered water systems for indoor and outdoor use, consisting of heaters, chillers, piping, tubing, couplings, pumps, valves, filters, vents, drains and/or temperature gauges, and parts and accessories for use therewith; and safety and emergency equipment, namely, tempered water systems consisting of tanks, heaters, chillers, compressed air cylinders, air conditioners, piping, tubing, couplings, pumps, valves, filters, vents, drains and/or temperature gauges, for use with drench showers, decontamination showers, and decontaminating eyewash and eye/face wash units, and parts and accessories for use therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 5, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 6, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 1, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 30, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 27, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 27, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 17, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |