USPTO serial 78333697
TCOM PIPELINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TCOM PIPELINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Emily H. Plotkin
EMILY H PLOTKIN BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN, ET AL211 COMMERCE ST STE 1000NASHVILLE, TN 37201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for teleconferencing and videoconferencing; computer software for transmitting, distributing, routing, integrating, sharing, controlling, enhancing, securing and managing audio, video and data communications to and from multiple users and locations; computer software to create, orchestrate and/or deliver distance learning courses; computer software for the secure exchange of credit card information | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Multimedia teleconferencing services, real-time multimedia communications services, and asynchronous multimedia communications services, which allow users to view electronic data, reminders, documents and applications, and which allow any user the ability to edit such data or documents and control such applications, even when such data, documents or applications are residing on another user's computer; telecommunications gateway services to connect various users in the field of distance learning including web-based online architectures and custom distributed architectures, including, but not limited to, virtual private networks or peer-to-peer architectures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2004 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |