USPTO serial 78333809
BECAUSE GOOD ENOUGH IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PIGNATELLO, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BECAUSE GOOD ENOUGH IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Council on Accreditation for Children and Family Services
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by Council on Accreditation for Children and Family Services
Council on Accreditation for Children and Family Services
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by Council on Accreditation for Children and Family Services
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PERLA M. KUHN
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| B | Testing, analysis and evaluation of the following services of others for the purpose of certification-- addiction or chemical dependency counseling; adoption services; adult day care; adult protective services; case management services; child care services; child protective services; co-dependency counseling; community building; community education services; community organization; community prevention services; community supported living; counseling services; crisis intervention services; day treatment; debt counseling services; diagnostic, assessment, and referral service for substance abuse; domestic violence counseling; drop-in centers for the homeless; early childhood education; early intervention services for infants and young children; emergency telephone response service; employee assistance programs; employment and vocational services; family-centered casework; family child care homes; family life education; family strengthening programs; financial management services; foster care; foster care for medically fragile infants and children, foster family care; foster or group care for unaccompanied minors, therapeutic treatment, foster care group homes; group services for social development and enrichment; home visitor services; homemaker-housekeeping services; independent living for youth information and referral service; in-home aide services; immigration and citizenship assistance; intensive family preservation; intensive outpatient treatment; intercountry adoption services; kinship care; mental health services; opiod treatment; outreach services; partial hospitalization; pregnancy counseling and supportive services; psychosocial/psychiatric rehabilitation; rape crisis and/or battered women's service; refugee resettlement service; residential centers; residential treatment; respite care; runaway children and youth service; safe homes; scattered site housing; shelter services; short-term shelter care; social advocacy services; support groups; supportive services; substance abuse counseling; substance abuse treatment; therapeutic outdoor service; transitional housing; treatment-oriented day care; volunteer friendship service, for families and children, foster homes, adoption agencies, juvenile centers, counseling centers, substance abuse centers, and credit counseling services | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Council on Accreditation for Children and Family Services
- Other trademarks owned by Council on Accreditation for Children and Family Services
- Other trademarks in Class B
- Similar marks named BECAUSE GOOD ENOUGH IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 4, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |