USPTO serial 78333835
VIRTUALLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIRTUALLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Saint - Laurent, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Candied fruit snacks, Nuts [shelled, roasted or otherwise processed], Candied nuts, Packaged ready-to-eat nuts, Snack mix [consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and/or raisins], Snack mix [consisting primarily of crackers, pretzels, candied nuts and/or popped popcorn], Protein based, Nutrient-dense snack bars, Hazelnut spread, Jams and Jellies | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Candy, Candy Bars, Candy coated popcorn, Candy coated apples, Candy mints, Ready to eat cereal derived food bars, Candy Snacks, Puffed corn snacks, Cheese flavored puffed corn snacks, Cheese balls snacks, Puddings, Granola-based snack bars, Chocolate, Chocolate covered nuts, Chocolate-based ready-to-eat food bars and Cocoa-based ingredient in confectionery products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |