USPTO serial 78333942
I1
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with I1?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Miami, FL
Miami, FL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, ATHLETIC UNIFORMS, HEADBANDS, NECKBANDS, SWEATBANDS, WRISTBANDS, BERMUDA SHORTS, BLOUSES, LEATHER COATS, OVERCOATS, RAINCOATS, SPORT COATS, SUIT COATS, TOP COATS, DRESSES, DUNGAREES, HATS, HEADWEAR, GYM SHORTS, BED JACKETS, FUR JACKETS, LEATHER JACKETS, WIND RESISTANT JACKETS, JEANS, JOGGING SUITS, JUMPSUITS, OVERALLS, ROBES, SHIRTS, SKIRTS, SUITS, GYM SUITS, PLAY SUITS, SKI SUITS, SNOW SUITS, SWEAT SUITS, VESTED SUITS, SWEATERS; FOOTWEAR, NAMELY, SHOES, SNEAKERS, ATHLETIC FOOTWEAR, BOOTIES, BOOTS, SANDALS, SLIPPERS; UNDERGARMENTS, NAMELY, BOXER SHORTS, BRIEFS, UNDERWEAR, HOSIERY, KNEE HIGHS, SOCKS; EARMUFFS, GLOVES, MITTENS, SCARVES, VESTS, CAPS, BANDANNAS, SHORTS, SWEAT SHIRTS, PANTS, BELTS FOR CLOTHING, SWIMWEAR, JACKETS, RAINWEAR, BLOUSES, PAJAMAS AND SLEEPWEAR; GOLF SHOE REPLACEMENTS CLEATS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Richard J. Welsher
- Other trademarks owned by Richard J. Welsher
- Other trademarks owned by Juan M. Diaz
- Other trademarks owned by Juan M. Diaz
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named I1
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 11, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 16, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 27, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 12, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |