Drawing for COSMETIQUE GENERIQUE

USPTO serial 78334038

COSMETIQUE GENERIQUE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COSMETIQUE GENERIQUE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005COSMETIC, TREATMENT (NON-MEDICAL) AND FRAGRANCE PRODUCTS FOR MEN AND WOMENACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 13, 2007PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Nov 13, 2006APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Aug 18, 2006PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jun 7, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 6, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 27, 2005UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jul 25, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 17, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 7, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 19, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 22, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 23, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance