USPTO serial 78334826
1.618
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 1.618?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert A. Voigt, Jr.
ROBERT A VOIGT JR WINSTEAD SECHREST & MINICK PCDALLAS, TX 75201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | FRAGRANCE AND BODY FOR PERSONAL USE, NAMELY, BATH GEL, BATH LOTION, BATH OILS, BODY EMULSIONS, BODY CREAM, BODY MASK CREAM, BODY MASK LOTION, BODY MASK POWDER, BODY MASKS, BODY MILKS, BODY OILS, BODY POWDER, BODY SCRUB, BODY SPRAYS, COSMETICS, EYE CREAM, EYE GEL, EYE MAKEUP, FACE CREAMS, FACIAL EMULSIONS, FACIAL MAKEUP, FACIAL MASKS, FACIAL SCRUBS, FRAGRANCES, MAKEUP, MASSAGE OIL, PERFUME, PERFUME OILS, SKIN CLARIFIERS, SKIN CLEANERS, SKIN CLEANSING CREAM, SKIN CLEANSING LOTION, SKIN CONDITIONERS, SKIN CREAM, SKIN EMOLLIENTS, SKIN LOTION, SKIN MASKS, SKIN MOISTURIZERS AND SKIN MOISTURIZER MASKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 5, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |