USPTO serial 78334860
INFORMATION WORLD, INCORPORATED I W I "WE DIDN'T CREATE THE WORLD, WE JUST INCORPORATED IT."
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOE, KELLY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INFORMATION WORLD, INCORPORATED I W I "WE DIDN'T CREATE THE WORLD, WE JUST INCORPORATED IT."?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | 1; Technical Information Services for private networks (including programming advice), Internet user help, and service provider debugging services within their software configuration; 2; Review, evaluation of, and professional critique for information to be considered as printed matter in technical books such as at McGraw-Hill; 3; Speaking about technology services by way of interview on syndicated television and interviews that may be considered for printed matter in journals; 4; Creation of original programming ;gif images, programming animation of their use, orignal creation of ;JPEG images for use in private networks, and consulting services to assist those developing ;gif and ;JEPG images; 5; Customized HTML and JAVA progamming services for individual internet web based users; 6; Customized HTML programming user interfaces for Home School customers accessing a private network; 7; Customized HTML programming of software for custom interfaces to access networks for special interest groups such as non-profit entities like churches; 8; Designing and creating prototype network user based software per potential customer request; This includes creating a design of interface with html, java, and batch file programming; 9; Design of private network software for homeland security use including JAVA, html, dreamweaver, batch file programing, and some custom DBASE language programs; 10; Individual techincal user services to debug MS-Windows and local service provider problems | ACTIVE | May 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Taylor, D Edgar (Ed)
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named INFORMATION WORLD, INCORPORATED I W I "WE DIDN'T CREATE THE WORLD, WE JUST INCORPORATED IT."
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 29, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 29, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |