Drawing for THE SERVICE INTEGRITY PROCESS

USPTO serial 78334926

THE SERVICE INTEGRITY PROCESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE SERVICE INTEGRITY PROCESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kenneth F. Florek

Kenneth F. Florek FLOREK & ENDRES PLLC1156 Avenue of the AmericasSuite 600New York, NY 10036-2702

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Mail room and message center services for others, namely, staffing and running a mail room or message center in a corporate office, building or facility environmentACTIVE—
037Cleaning of buildings and facilities; maintenance and renovation of buildings and facilities; janitorial services; carpet and rug cleaning and shampooing; window cleaning; trash collection; waste disposal for others; cleaning, buffing and polishing of metal and stone; door maintenance and repair services; furniture restoration, repair and maintenance; floor sanding; extermination other than for agriculture; pest controlACTIVE—
045Concierge services for others comprising making requested personal arrangements and reservations and providing customer specific information to meet individual needs rendered together in a building or facility environment; security guard services; monitoring security systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 27, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 10, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 10, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 10, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 26, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 3, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 13, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 14, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 11, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 8, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 1, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 28, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 13, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 24, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance