Drawing for WATERFRONT AND FAIRWAYS

USPTO serial 78335022

WATERFRONT AND FAIRWAYS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WATERFRONT AND FAIRWAYS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kenneth N. Caldwell

KENNETH N CALDWELL WATSON ROUNDS333 N RANCHO DR STE 800LAS VEGAS, NV 89106UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Men's, women's, and children's clothing; namely, shirts, shorts, pants, and outerwear, namely, coats, jackets, pullovers and vestsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 28, 2005ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Oct 27, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 17, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 13, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 9, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 12, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 16, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 24, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance