Drawing for ROCKEFELLER BROTHERS FUND PHILANTHROPY FOR AN INTERDEPENDENT WORLD

USPTO serial 78335203

ROCKEFELLER BROTHERS FUND PHILANTHROPY FOR AN INTERDEPENDENT WORLD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3019697Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 29, 2005
Examiner
PERKINS, ELLEN J
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with ROCKEFELLER BROTHERS FUND PHILANTHROPY FOR AN INTERDEPENDENT WORLD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephanie B. Glaser

Stephanie B. Glaser Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP1133 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Philanthropic services, namely providing grants to non-profit organizations and other entities to support charitable programs relating to democratic practice, sustainable environmental development, peace and security between the United States and foreign [counties,] * countries, * arts and culture, and public educationACTIVEJul 26, 2003
043Providing workshop facilities to non-profit organizationsACTIVEJul 26, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2026NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2026RNL2REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Feb 12, 202689AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Feb 12, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 11, 2025E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2025EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Nov 5, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 5, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2025CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2025COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2024REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2015NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2015RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jun 22, 201589AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jun 22, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 1, 2015E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2011NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2011C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 9, 2011E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2006COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Jun 21, 2006PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Dec 6, 2005AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
Dec 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 6, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 17, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 28, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 22, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 15, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 14, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2005REINREINSTATED—
Apr 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 4, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 6, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 29, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance