USPTO serial 78335407
PULZAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BRIAN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PULZAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven A. Bent
BARBARA A FRIEDMAN EDELL, SHAPIRO & FINNAN LLC1901 RESEARCH BLVD STE 400ROCKVILLE, MD 20850UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Lasers for non-medical purposes; laser beam scanning systems for lasers for non-medical purposes, including lasers, scanners, trackers, hardware and software; laser beam scanning apparatus and equipment for lasers for non-medical purposes, including lasers, scanners, trackers, hardware and software; tracking systems for lasers for non-medical purposes, including lasers,scanners, trackers, hardware and software; tracking apparatus and equipment for lasers for non-medical purposes, including lasers, scanners, trackers, hardware and software; pans, fittings and accessories in this class for any of the aforesaid goods; software and computer programs, including software and computer programs for medical and non-medical lasers, medical and non-medical laser beam scanning systems, medical and non-medical laser beam scanning apparatus, tracking systems for medical and non-medical lasers, tracking apparatus for medical and non-medical lasers, ophthalmic purposes involving the use of lasers, scanners, trackers, hardware and software, ophthalmic procedures involving the use of lasers, scanners, trackers, hardware and software, ophthalmic surgery involving the use of lasers, scanners, trackers, hardware and software, eye tracking and ancillary procedures involving the use of lasers, scanners, trackers, hardware and software, ophthalmic apparatus, ophthalmic equipment and diagnostics for measuring the visual pathways of the eye | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Lasers for medical purposes, including lasers for ophthalmic surgery and ophthalmic procedures; laser beam scanning systems for lasers for medical purposes, including, lasers, scanners, trackers, hardware and software; laser beam scanning apparatus and equipment for lasers for medical purposes, including lasers, scanners, trackers, hardware and software; tracking systems for lasers for medical purposes, including lasers, scanners, trackers, hardware and software; tracking apparatus and equipment for lasers for medical purposes, including lasers, scanners, trackers, hardware and software; medical apparatus, equipment and instruments, including eye scanning apparatus and equipment, and eye tracking apparatus and equipment; diagnostic apparatus, equipment and tools for measuring the visual pathways of the eye; parts fittings and accessories in this class for any of the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2006 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 31, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 5, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 4, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |