USPTO serial 78335538
BUCKEYE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCRAY, RENEE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BUCKEYE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen B. Salai
Stephen B. Salai Harter Secrest & Emery LLP1600 Bausch & Lomb PlaceRochester, NY 14604-2711UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Food products and snack foods, namely, popped popcorn and cheese flavored snacks, namely-- cheese puffs and twists | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BIRDS EYE FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Linden Oaks Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Linden Oaks Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named BUCKEYE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 29, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 26, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 7, 2007 | PGDV | PETITION GRANTED - REQUEST TO DIVIDE FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 30, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2007 | MAB7 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| May 3, 2007 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 6, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 21, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 1, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |