USPTO serial 78335609
Serial No. 78335609
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 78335609?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Neuhausen, CH
Neuhausen, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George A. Coury
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Surgical apparatus and instruments, namely, scalpels, tweezers, scissors, in particular surgical and microsurgical haemostatic clamps; surgical and microsurgical suture materials. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 14, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 10, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 29, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 12, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |